--2 Potential Mayoral Candidate Announces He's Gay
       
Oct. 20, 2014

This Week's SFR Picks

Newsletters

Choose your newsletter(s):
* indicates required
September 23, 2014 by Joey Peters  
September 23, 2014 by Justin Horwath  
October 7, 2014 by Joey Peters  
September 24, 2014 by Enrique Limón  
September 17, 2014 by Julie Ann Grimm  

SFR Events

Special Issues

 

 
big-picture-gay-marriage

Potential Mayoral Candidate Announces He's Gay

Javier Gonzales, former Democratic Party chairman, made the disclosure in a blog post

August 21, 2013, 1:00 pm
By Justin Horwath

Potential Santa Fe mayoral candidate Javier Gonzales said in a blog post today that he's gay. 

"You see," the former Democratic Party of New Mexico chairman wrote on Familia es Familia, "when you come from a traditional family with deep roots in this community, the process of accepting that you are gay is complicated with fears about disappointing those you love, or becoming disconnected with a sense of place that is as much a part of me as my sexuality."

Meanwhile, state representative Bill McCamley, D-Las Cruces, tells SFR he's in Santa Fe to meet with Mayor David Coss about same-sex marriage. 

He says this morning, the Dona Ana County Clerk started issuing licenses that say "spouse and spouse" instead of "bride and groom."

Fifteen people have received marriage licenses there, he says. 

"Santa Fe has had an active interest in this situation, this issue," McCamley says, "and we're going to go—I'm going to let him know exactly what's going on down there."

McCamley originally asked Attorney General Gary King, a Democrat, to issue an opinion on whether state law allows county clerks to issue same-sex marriage licenses. 

Santa Fe City Attorney Geno Zamora argued in his own memo that state law doesn't prohibit gay marriage, but an analysis by King's office disagrees with Santa Fe's interpretation. King's analysis said that while state law doesn't allow same-sex marriage, the practice of denying same-sex couples marriage licenses is vulnerable to a court challenge on constitutional grounds.


 

comments powered by Disqus
 
Close
Close
Close