Sept. 26, 2016
Home / Articles / News / Local News /  Why-Oh-Wi-Fi
BRIEFSWEB

Why-Oh-Wi-Fi

In Brief

August 11, 2010, 1:00 am
SFR readers will remember that earlier this year, Santa Fe anti-wireless activist Arthur Firstenberg sued his neighbor Raphaela Monribot, claiming her use of an iPhone and wireless internet aggravated his “electrical hypersensitivity,” or EHS—a condition for which there is little peer-reviewed scientific evidence.

First Judicial District Court Judge Sarah Singleton quickly threw out the part of Firstenberg’s claim regarding the offending iPhone. Lately, she’s penned a few rulings that don’t appear favorable to Firstenberg’s case, most recently denying his motion for temporary relief.

On July 8, Singleton also discounted an affidavit Firstenberg submitted by Olle Johansson, an “experimental dermatology” professor at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden. Johansson claims there is no psychological component to EHS.

Singleton ruled that Johansson’s testimony “does not establish that in this particular case there could not be a psychological component to [Firstenberg’s] impairment.”

Heavy skepticism aside, Singleton ruled last week that Firstenberg’s lawsuit could proceed; she has scheduled a non-jury trial for March, 2011, in the case of the toxic gadgets.

 

comments powered by Disqus
 

Morning Word: Death Penalty Reinstatement Would Cost State Millions

Morning Word At the same time New Mexico lawmakers are trying to shore up the state’s budget, the New Mexico Public Defender's Office is questioning the costs associated with reinstating the death penalty.  ... More

Sept. 22, 2016 by Peter St. Cyr

Newsletters

* indicates required
Choose your newsletter(s):
August 31, 2016 by Julie Ann Grimm  
September 7, 2016 by Elizabeth Miller  
August 31, 2016 by Elizabeth Miller  
September 14, 2016 by Steven Hsieh  

@SFReporter on Instagram

 

 
Close
Close
Close