Saturday, May 18, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
— Feed Me
Going vegan without starving? Yes, it’s possible
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Author

Letter America May 4, 2013 Jonathan Franzen ... More

May 06, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 0
 
 
 

 

 
News 02.14.2012 0 Comments

Martinez Allies File Federal Complaint Against Redistricting Ruling

By Joey Peters
NM-districting-puzzle

 Three days after the Supreme Court rejected new state House of Representative districts favored by the governor, allies of Susana Martinez yesterday filed a complaint about the ruling to federal court.

The initial High Court ruling remanded the case back to retired District Judge James Hall, instructing him to draw new maps by Feb. 27. In January, Hall chose the executive House redistricting over the plan passed by the Democratically-controlled Legislature. In his reasoning, he said the executive plan had less population changes, or deviation, aligning more with the federal requirement of one-person, one-vote.

But the High Court found the map to show partisan bias by increasing Republican swing districts by three seats and Republican-leaning districts by three seats. The Court also said it was OK for Hall to draw districts with higher deviations to protect "communities of interest" to meet clauses in the Federal Voting Rights Act. The ruling ordered for Clovis, for instance, to be drawn to accommodate a Hispanic-majority voting age population.

Yesterday's complaint, which comes from plaintiffs describing themselves as prospective state House candidates, dismissed those sentiments.

"A State District Court has drawn a lawful redistricting plan," the complaint reads. "The Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, however ... remanded the District Court's decision with instructions that can only result in a plan that will violate the one person, one vote Constitutional mandate."

The complaint calls for a three-judge federal panel to rule the Supreme Court ruling unconstitutional and draw up new districts. It could also delay any action from Hall to draw new maps.

"My strong hope is that's not the case," John Wertheim, a lawyer representing the Democrats in redistricting, tells SFR. "Hall has to be able to finish his work."

Read the complaint:


USDistrictCourtcomplaint
Document
Pages
Zoom

              
p. 1
Loading Loading
p. 2
Loading Loading
p. 3
Loading Loading
To print the document, click the "Original Document" link to open the original PDF. At this time it is not possible to print the document with annotations.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close