Monday, May 20, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
— Feed Me
Going vegan without starving? Yes, it’s possible
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Southwest Airlines

Letter America Dear Southwest Airlines, I’m writing to complain about the unfair way I was treated on a recent flight from San Francisco to Phoenix. ... More

May 20, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 0
 
 
 

 

 
News 07.14.2011 3 Comments

Gary King goes on the defensive

The Attorney General is accused of conflicts of interest

By Joey Peters
Gary King

 Neck deep in allegations of ethic violations, Attorney General Gary King channeled Paul Harvey last month by telling reporters "the rest of the story."


King's press conference, snippets of which were posted today on the attorney general's website, centered around conflict of interest allegations from former Republican state Sen. Victor Marshall. Marshall is an attorney for Frank Foy, the former chief investment officer for the Educational Retirement Board who filed two lawsuits alleging pay-to-play schemes at the ERB and the State Investment Council.

A defendant in both lawsuits is former ERB Chairman Bruce Malott, who served as treasurer of King's failed 2004 campaign for congress. King is attempting to take over the corruption allegations against the State Investment Council. The Albuquerque Journal reported on June 18 that King's office filed two new lawsuits "seeking damages from more than a dozen people."

Marshall deems King's involvement a conflict of interest because of his political relations with Malott. Malott was filing campaign reports for King through last year.

A June 18 editorial from the Santa Fe New Mexican heavily criticized King's actions, asking whether he's "trying to foul up the case against a bunch of power-abusing Democrats who might include former Gov. Bill Richardson."

On the relationship between King and Malott, it continued: "That's clearly a conflict of interest, and Marshall argues with good reason, that King should recuse himself from the case. We'd go a step further, suggesting that he consider recusing himself from office." 

But another conflict of interest pops up here: Marshall is a legal counsel to the New Mexican. But that's another story...

In last month's press conference, King acknowledged that it's easy to make the conflict allegation between him and Malott.

"A lot of times the campaign treasurer is a close friend or a big fundraiser or a big financial supporter of the candidate," King told reporters at the time. "In this case Mr. Malott was none of these things."

King went on to say that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recommended he "not use a friend or a big supporter or someone like that to be the treasurer" for his 2004 run for Congress, but someone with experience as a treasurer in federal campaigns.

King maintained that Malott isn't involved in any of the cases his office has been involved in, making it "impossible for there to be a conflict." Malott isn't a defendant in the AG's new lawsuits because they deal only with the State Investment Council, not the ERB. But Foy still accuses some of the defendants in the AG lawsuit of conspiring with Malott on ERB investment deals. 

"If I allowed everybody to knock me off a case just by alleging that I had some interest or conflict of interest, I wouldn't be a very good attorney general," King told reporters.

He also used his office's prosecution against former Secretary of State Rebecca Vigil-Girón as evidence that he's "not afraid to prosecute or pursue actions against somebody just because I know them politically."


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
07.23.2011 at 10:00 | Reply |

"If I allowed everybody to knock me off a case just by alleging that I had some interest or conflict of interest, I wouldn't be a very good attorney general," Well he's not a vey good attorney general so....
Regardless, any lawyer knows it does not matter that King claims Malott was not his good friend and only his treasurer. Under the ethical rules for attorneys the "perception of a conflict" is the issue, and anyone can perceive there is a problem here. On top of that Malott was also Richardson's treasurer. Malott was the chair of the ERB, where a flood of questionable investments were made, but is not a target of the investigation?

Kings brken down fiddle is getting to sound more lame all the time. He is on the defensive for a reason, because he has miserabley failed at getting anything accomplished as AG and has dragged down a once credible Attorney General's Office. One example is the Medicaid Fraud cases, where under King it has dropped from an award winning division, to 49th in the nation. The division used to be a money maker for the state in collections, now it is is losing $3 million a year.

 

07.23.2011 at 10:47 | Reply |

Intersting comment from King here, that he's "not afraid to prosecute or pursue actions against somebody just because I know them politically." That is the whole point with a conflict of interest, a prosecutor cannot charge someone they know as they may have a bias for or against that person. The district attorney's recuse themselves from cases constantly where they might be any personal, working or polticial relationship. The fact that King refused from 2007 to now in 2011 whne the judge forcibly removed him from the case. This exposes the biggest fault in our judicial system, criminal prosecutors that are polticians. They can use their power helpfully for their friends or punitively for their enmies. Sine they can pick and choose the cases they decide to charge, their political career drives those choices.
The recent attempt by King to go after Herctor Balderas comes to mind. The year the Vigil-Giron investigation started, she was looking at running for higher office, so I have to wonder...

 

07.24.2011 at 03:16 | Reply |

King's time in office has been a joke, but has he noticed we're not laughing?  He has been caught denying so many things already, that I just can't believe him anymore.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close