Friday, May 24, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— The Canary in the Copper Mine (is dead)
How New Mexico's copper industry wrote its own rules
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Southwest Airlines

Letter America Dear Southwest Airlines, I’m writing to complain about the unfair way I was treated on a recent flight from San Francisco to Phoenix. ... More

May 20, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 5
 
 
 

 

 
News 06.29.2011 3 Comments

Agua Fria Project Won't Start this Summer

Budget woes could shaft community

By Wren Abbot
Sweeney-demo-MS-l

 As the cost estimate for rebuilding Agua Fria Elementary School continues to skyrocket, members of the Agua Fria neighborhood question whether project features designed to placate them will be the first to get cut.

Agua Fria Neighborhood Association President William Mee and neighbors Tamara Lichtenstein and Genesis Purce brought these concerns before the Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education Monday during the public comment period of the board's study session. Mee said that the project's architect, Claudio Vigil, made promises to the neighborhood for special features of the project, including a wall on the west and south part of the property, shielding landscaping and preservation of parts of the historic adobe building in an exhibit at the new school.

"As the budget for the project evaporates away, these what I'm calling 'amenities' would be in jeopardy of not getting done or not getting done well," Mee told the board. "What we would like is a resolution from the Board of Education to specify what can be provided to the community, because right now we have nothing in writing, yet a lot of promises have been made."


Mee's concerns stem from an announcement last week that all of the construction bids for the project were wildly over Vigil's projected budget. The school's construction was projected by Vigil to cost $16 million; each of the eight bids the school received was upwards of $22 million.


BoE Vice President Glenn Wikle tells SFR that he thinks Mee's concern is warranted.


"If that’s what they were told they were going to get, I think we need to live up to what was promised," Wikle says.


Lichtenstein told the board that the rebid process creates an opportunity to reconsider one of the more controversial aspects of the project—the proposed demolition of a 1930's-era adobe building. 


"Please reconsider demolishing Agua Fria’s traditional adobe schoolhouse," Lichteinstein told the board. "I feel we have an opportunity to have another look at the situation because of what happened with the bids coming in too high and affecting construction and demolition schedules for the summer."


Wikle said at the study session that he thinks SFPS's construction team should give the idea of building the new school on a different site a fresh look.

"We're trying to squeeze a huge school building into a tight property," Wikle said.

Wikle also tells SFR that he has concerns about the project being delayed because summer—the ideal time for school construction—is a-wastin'.

"All the extra maneuvering to accomodate the children means the cost of construction is higher during those days than it is when the school's not operating," Wikle says.

Agua Fria Elementary School Construction Manager Leo Prenevost confirms that the project won't be starting this summer.

"This is July and we don't have a contractor on board," Prenevost says. "I don't see us having a contractor this summer."

Yet another reason to question whether the bond money funding the project will really be able to cover it.


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
06.29.2011 at 03:07 | Reply |

I was stunned to learn that efforts had gone into protecting the school's little garden between the gym and the adobe, because the garden has a "teaching component," yet the historic building didn't get any protection! Board member Linda Trujillo rightfully suggests that the historic adobe has a teaching component as well, as therefore deserves protection.

 

06.29.2011 at 03:23 | Reply |

I hope that other members of the Board of Education take Mr. Wikle's suggestion seriously, to consider building on an alternate site. It makes sense in terms of the size of the proposed project and the conflicts inherent in having all that work going on for years while students are in school; it makes fiscal sense to preserve and reuse buildings rather than tear them down. There are exciting potential alternative uses for the existing facilities. If everyone's goal is to have a well-designed, well-constructed campus, don't cut corners by reducing safety standards which could put students at risk (this has apparently been proposed), and don't try to cram a much bigger magnet-type school onto a site where the road infrastructure of a little old village can't handle it, and neighbors are impacted by idling, congested traffic. Build on a more appropriate site, without the traffic problems of the current site. The demographic center of this school's catchment has migrated farther west, so building a new facility farther west will reduce district transportation expenses--many more kids might actually be able to walk to school, which is one of the goals of those of us looking at how to ensure that schools promote a healthy lifestyle. The district has made expensive mistakes in the past; let's make sure this isn't another one, since it may cost over $20 million of taxpayer money. Taxpayers, pay attention to how your money is used...

 

06.29.2011 at 10:35 | Reply |

A lot of readers may see this and think of it as another NOT IN MY BACKYARD situation.  But that is not the case.  We as a neighborhood want to see the school fixed.  Since the orinigal 1935 school was added onto in 1966 we have been getting substandard building after substandard building to the tune of about $30 million dollars with no accountability when a roof leaks, a HVAC system doesn't work or the stormwater drains right into a building. 

The latest architect has been paid over a million dollars and there isn't a tangible product yet.  Time to have a lawyer talk to him and get something in the way of work out of him.  He is engaged with two other twenty million dollar projects for which he gets 8% of the total value--- and I would question whether he is overextended.   I am much like you the reader, and have not even been paid a million dollars in my whole career; no less than receive it all in one poorly done project.  So a little professionalism and accountability is required from this project for you the reader and taxpayer.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close