Friday, May 24, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— The Canary in the Copper Mine (is dead)
How New Mexico's copper industry wrote its own rules
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Southwest Airlines

Letter America Dear Southwest Airlines, I’m writing to complain about the unfair way I was treated on a recent flight from San Francisco to Phoenix. ... More

May 20, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 5
 
 
 

 

 
News 07.29.2010 1 Comments

Pork Chops: Extended

By Alexa Schirtzinger
Pork_chops  This week’s Indicators focuses on the earmarks New Mexico’s congressional delegation is hauling in. Regardless of what you think of the whole pork phenomenon—political corruption? community development? something in between?—it’s always interesting to see where all the (taxpayer) money goes.

We'll start with some of the big stuff and work our way down into the nitty-gritty of New Mexico's earmarks. Click any graphic to enlarge.

Top earmark recipients (FY 2010):


The top three recipients generally received a smattering of earmarks for different parks, forests and wilderness areas across the US. OpenSecrets.org, where SFR got this data, doesn't list exactly what the money was used for.

The University of Alabama topped the list in FY09, with the bulk of its earmarks going to weather and engineering research projects. But here's where things get interesting: The far column lists the amount of money spent on lobbying. At $360,000 Alabama's is a mere drop in the bucket. To wit:


That's the list of top recipients sorted by money spent on lobbying. Defense contractors are in gray.

On to New Mexico, then. Here's a close-up of the graphic we used in the story, showing the earmarks each legislator landed in FY 2010:


As you'll see, our top rainmaker is Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman, with $121.6 million in total earmarks. (That includes all bills with Bingaman's name on them; often, they're shared with other NM Senators or Reps.)

Bingaman also happens to be the one with the lowest percentage of earmarks going to campaign contributors (1.9%). Democratic Sen. Tom Udall runs a close second to Bingaman in both categories: $116 million and change in earmarks, with 2.0% going to contributors. US Reps don't generally do as well, bringing in between $10 and $56 million in earmarks with higher percentages for contributors.

But as with everything government, it's not that simple. Check out Bingaman and Udall's top earmark recipients:

$20.2 million to White Sands Missile Range and Air Force bases (Holloman, Cannon)

$11.6 million to defense contractors (General Atomics, Northrop Grumman and Goodrich)

$10.1 million to the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology for homeland security

Democratic Rep. Harry Teague, who brought in the highest earmarks of the state's US Reps (and gave the highest percentage, 13.5%, to contributors), upped his total by signing onto the big defense awards.

The only one who didn't was Democratic Rep. Ben Ray Luján, who helped pour $2.8 million into the New Mexico Army National Guard but whose biggest single project was an acequia irrigation system ($2.4 million).

Thanks to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, it's easy to search out this stuff—so if that's not enough, you can still dig to your heart's content.

Cross-posted on SFR Muckraker's Guide.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
07.30.2010 at 09:14 | Reply |

Very interesting.  A Cato Institute study indicated earmarks rarely add economic vitality when that is their intent, which should be no surprise given the effectiveness of the Democrat Stimulus Plan.  Boeing doesn't have a big footprint in NM, be interesting to see what WA politicians gave to them. 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close