Facebook Connect
This Week's SFR Picks
 
Best of Santa Fe 2012 Vote NOW

SFR's Best of Santa Fe Voting
SFReporter Subscription
Sign Up for SFR:
Email Newsletter

Weekly Poll

What do you think of SFR´s new cover design?

 

 

 

 

 

Discuss Vote   

Getting poll results. Please wait...
— Catch-19?
NM’s decision to review its gun policies has advocates up in arms
— All Business
Tanti Luce 221 is about more than just food--and that's a good thing
— Under the Wire
Blue Cross Blue Shield pushes for yet another rate hike—its seventh in eight years—before new financial transparency rules kick in
— Bus-ted
For years, local officials used a Texas price agreement to green-light bus purchases. Now they’ve stopped—but the same out-of-state bus company still dominates the market
— Making Enemies
Public Enemy is coming, but can you attend?

 

 
SFReeper 06.09.2010 0 Comments
 
 

To Health With It: Legislative Finance Committee mulls Health Department's future

By Alexa Schirtzinger
"It doesn't matter what we say here today," Pam Galbraith, the analyst charged with evaluating the Department of Health's developmental disabilities programs, told the Legislative Finance Committee this morning. "We're going to distress one stakeholder or another."

The stakeholders were there, but they kept quiet through Galbraith's presentation on the budgetary future of disability programs run through the DOH and HSD (Human Services Dept.). Details on the report's findings and recommendations are after the jump.

Galbraith started with the numbers:

3,792 people currently receive care through the state's Medicaid-funded developmental disabilities (DD) waiver program

4,555 people are currently on the waiting list for the DD waiver program

7 to 8 years is the average time a DD waiver participant will spend on the waiting list

Meanwhile, departmental budgets continue to decline, and federal appropriations for Medicaid are due to decline drastically when stimulus money dries up next year. Galbraith suggested reevaluating people on the waiting list to see if they could fit into other care programs, reassessing DD waiver participants' needs and reevaluating their reimbursements.

After Galbraith spoke, Health Secretary Alfredo Vigil gave a brief speech about the importance of rewriting the DD waiver (see this week's news). But Vigil, too, lamented the vitriol such discussions can provoke:

"Any time you're talking about any kind of adjustment to the [DD waiver] program, that's considered by somebody to be a threat," Vigil told the committee. "There's very, very little you can put on the table that's considered emotionally neutral." Even so, Vigil pledged to take a hard look at his department's budget, which he characterized as "daunting."

Most legislators responded with praise for Galbraith's report. Sen. Rod Adair, R-Chaves, revisited a familiar topic—the Jackson lawsuit—and grilled Vigil on where he was getting $4.9 million to pay Jackson costs.

"You're taking it [from] people who need services and you're paying this lawsuit without the permission of the legislature?" Adair asked Vigil. "The constitution says you shall not issue any payments of that type without legislative authorization. On what authorization are you paying these fees?"

Vigil responded that the lawsuit

She also brought up an interesting finding: the potential conflict of interest in a husband-wife team that, in a word, kept patients in the family. (One was a case manager, Galbraith said, and the other a provider.)

Galbraith's report examines the strengths, weaknesses and general future of developmental disability services in New Mexico—as well as of the two departments responsible for administering that care, the DOH and HSD (Human Services Department). Among her recommendations are contingency budget plans, cost savings and a joint powers agreement between the two departments.
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close