Thursday, May 23, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— The Canary in the Copper Mine (is dead)
How New Mexico's copper industry wrote its own rules
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Southwest Airlines

Letter America Dear Southwest Airlines, I’m writing to complain about the unfair way I was treated on a recent flight from San Francisco to Phoenix. ... More

May 20, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 5
 
 
 

 

 
News 04.06.2010 0 Comments

Nuke It or Lose It: Obama Releases Nuclear Posture Review

By Alexa Schirtzinger


Today, the Department of Defense released its Nuclear Posture Review, a "roadmap for implementing President Obama's agenda" on nuclear weapons—a somewhat muddled one, as evidenced in the review:

This NPR places the prevention of nuclear terrorism and proliferation at the top of the US policy agenda...At the same time...the US must sustain a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal.

Speculations abound on what the NPR really means—and in New Mexico, its implications are sure to be magnified. Read what some nuke activists are saying after the jump.

Here's Jay Coghlan, the director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico. He calls the review's stated nonproliferation goal "laudable" but says in a statement that it "needs to be matched on the ground." To wit:
Of importance to northern New Mexico is the conclusion to fund the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) Project at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Apparently bowing to pressure from the weapons laboratories, the NPR stated that the CMRR was needed to sustain the nuclear arsenal. But it also goes past that and calls for “some modest capacity [that] will be put in place for surge production in the event of significant geopolitical “surprise.” Once that capacity is installed we believe the door remains open for expanded plutonium pit production at LANL.

Production remains tied to reduction. It's not clear to us how, as stated in the NPR, expanding production infrastructure will allow excess warheads to be retired along with other planned stockpile reductions. “Funding the CMRR allows increased weapons production capacity and has nothing to do with retiring warheads,” said Scott Kovac, operations director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, “it's surprising that the administration is allowing the funding of this $4.5 billion project to blight an otherwise great NPR.”


Greg Mello of the Los Alamos Study Group offers a "preliminary opinion," also via written statement:
[I]t is a status-quo document that makes only minor adjustments in nuclear weapons policy.  These it makes in what the Administration hopes will be somewhat more effective global power projection plan overall.  It perpetuates all the major nuclear myths, temporizes with respect to all the tough issues, and offers a great deal of what the Bush Administration offered, just in different, Democrat-friendly language.  It attaches the greatest salience to nuclear weapons which do not exist and attaches relatively little to which do.  Policy continuities from the previous two presidents seem to dominate, by far.
Of special interest to New Mexico journalists, the NPR blesses the massive Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF), the largest public works project in New Mexico history in constant dollars by a factor of about 9, not including the interstate highways in New Mexico.

Stay tuned for some more detailed analysis later. For now, though, I'm off to the public hearing on whether Los Alamos National Lab should be allowed to burn hazardous waste in the open air!
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close