--2 Whistleblower Frank Foy Testifies At Senate Judiciary Committee
Sept. 26, 2016

Whistleblower Frank Foy Testifies At Senate Judiciary Committee

January 21, 2010, 12:00 am
By Corey Pein

The New Mexico Senate Judiciary Committee hearing featuring pay-to-play whistleblower Frank Foy is about to start. Check back here and at the New Mexico Independent's liveblog for updates throughout.

In the meantime, here's a bit of reading on the essentials of Foy's case.

Update 2:24 pm: As much as $200 million may have been at stake in the pay-to-pay allegations brought by Foy.

Foy has taken at seat and his attorney, Victor Marshall, is speaking now.

2:36 pm: Marshall: "we are now estimating that the total losses on all those Vanderbilt investments [by the Educational Retirement Board] are around $286 million."

2:42 pm: Foy's case has been delayed, Marshall says, because it sits before First Judicial District Judge Stephen Pfeffer, whose fully booked criminal docket takes precedence.

"If we had gotten the documents we'd asked for last January, we think Gary Bland would've been gone a long time ago," Marshall says.

Update 2:52pm: Marshall says a court hearing would resolve some of these issues--and funding for the state Attorney General would help, too.

Marshall paintied a picture of a nationwide web of public fund corruption that benefits some of the same financial institutions--"like Bear Stearns," Marshall says--that whose bets on mortgage-backed securities helped cause the economic crisis.

Update 2:57 pm: "I think you're a hero," Sen. John Ryan, R-Bernalillo, tells Foy. "I'd like to see our government get on the side of you and the people."

Sen. Cisco McSorley, D-Bernalillo, says some people think the Educational Retirement Board may not have known about the kickbacks, technically known as "third-party payments."

McSorley also floats a conspiracy theory that New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer had an "exposure problem" (i.e., his prostitute), because he was ready to expose corrupt practices at Wall Street investment firms.

Update 3:06 pm: Marshall says New Mexico taxpayers' money was "skimmed and used to pay bribes in New York."

Update 3:10 pm: Sen. Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe, addresses the delay at the local district court. "We're short three judges," Wirth says. "Judge Pfeffer is the criminal judge, and the reality is you can't get a civil sitting on anything."

My battery's dying. This could be the last post until later.


comments powered by Disqus

Morning Word: Death Penalty Reinstatement Would Cost State Millions

Morning Word At the same time New Mexico lawmakers are trying to shore up the state’s budget, the New Mexico Public Defender's Office is questioning the costs associated with reinstating the death penalty.  ... More

Sept. 22, 2016 by Peter St. Cyr


* indicates required
Choose your newsletter(s):
August 31, 2016 by Julie Ann Grimm  
September 7, 2016 by Elizabeth Miller  
August 31, 2016 by Elizabeth Miller  
September 14, 2016 by Steven Hsieh  

@SFReporter on Instagram