Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— That’s a Lota Treasure!
In SFR’s new humor column, Forrest Fenn pulls a fast one
— Summer Guide 2013
93 Days of Summer; 93 Ways to Enjoy Them
— Downs Doings
Sources: FBI has conducted interviews about controversial racino deal
— Cinderella Story
Santa Fe Fuego: America's worst, most lovable baseball team
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Doctor Guy Walksintoabar

Letter America Dear Doctor Guy, My friend recently stopped taking my calls because I’m dating her ex-boyfriend, but they broke up like over two years ago. I don’t know what to do.—Helpless Hottie ... More

Jun 17, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 0
 
 
 

 

 
News 01.22.2009 0 Comments

Sorta Helps Answer That Question

By Corey Pein
Here's a new wrinkle in the slowly unfolding saga around Gov. Bill Richardson and CDR, a financial advisory firm hired by the state that just happened to be a major Richardson campaign donor.

A couple of weeks ago, we asked, "Did the labyrinthine financial deals the state entered under [Richardson's] watch with companies like CDR actually save taxpayers money? Or is this more of the alchemy that brought down Wall Street last fall?"

Today, Barry Massey of the Associated Press reports that the state is on the hook for $16 million in collateral, because somebody at the New Mexico Finance Authority failed to properly scrutinize a complex bond deal negotiated with CDR.

"The collateral calls represent more than a financial inconvenience for the state; they mean fewer dollars available for highway construction projects," Massey writes.

How did this happen? The experts shrug.

"We don't think anybody at the Finance Authority internally could have had the depth and breadth of experience to make this assessment at that time," the Finance Authority's chief financial officer tells Massey. "The issue in my mind is there may have been [outside contractors] that also had a duty to inform us ... [T]his would have been something CDR, as a swap adviser, should have been qualified to address and should have addressed."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close