Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— The Radness of King George
'Game of Thrones' mastermind George RR Martin talks childhood, popcorn and his latest acquisition
— Slaughterhorse-Five
The inner workings of NM’s first equine slaughterhouse
— The Canary in the Copper Mine (is dead)
How New Mexico's copper industry wrote its own rules
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Southwest Airlines

Letter America Dear Southwest Airlines, I’m writing to complain about the unfair way I was treated on a recent flight from San Francisco to Phoenix. ... More

May 20, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 3
 
 
 

 

 
News 01.22.2009 0 Comments

Sorta Helps Answer That Question

By Corey Pein
Here's a new wrinkle in the slowly unfolding saga around Gov. Bill Richardson and CDR, a financial advisory firm hired by the state that just happened to be a major Richardson campaign donor.

A couple of weeks ago, we asked, "Did the labyrinthine financial deals the state entered under [Richardson's] watch with companies like CDR actually save taxpayers money? Or is this more of the alchemy that brought down Wall Street last fall?"

Today, Barry Massey of the Associated Press reports that the state is on the hook for $16 million in collateral, because somebody at the New Mexico Finance Authority failed to properly scrutinize a complex bond deal negotiated with CDR.

"The collateral calls represent more than a financial inconvenience for the state; they mean fewer dollars available for highway construction projects," Massey writes.

How did this happen? The experts shrug.

"We don't think anybody at the Finance Authority internally could have had the depth and breadth of experience to make this assessment at that time," the Finance Authority's chief financial officer tells Massey. "The issue in my mind is there may have been [outside contractors] that also had a duty to inform us ... [T]his would have been something CDR, as a swap adviser, should have been qualified to address and should have addressed."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 
 
Close
Close
Close