Monday, June 17, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— That’s a Lota Treasure!
In SFR’s new humor column, Forrest Fenn pulls a fast one
— Downs Doings
Sources: FBI has conducted interviews about controversial racino deal
— Cinderella Story
Santa Fe Fuego: America's worst, most lovable baseball team
— Summer Guide 2013
93 Days of Summer; 93 Ways to Enjoy Them
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Doctor Guy Walksintoabar

Letter America Dear Doctor Guy, My friend recently stopped taking my calls because I’m dating her ex-boyfriend, but they broke up like over two years ago. I don’t know what to do.—Helpless Hottie ... More

Jun 17, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 0
 
 
 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Local News /  Fringe Benefit
Local News 10.02.2012 2 Comments

Fringe Benefit

Santa Fe’s community workforce agreement: worker protection or union windfall?

By Joey Peters
DSCF9869 Santa Fe Mayor David Coss speaks at a union rally at the state capitol last year.

Eight months ago, when the Santa Fe City Council unanimously passed new rules mandating that contractors for large city construction projects work closely with organized labor, it stayed largely under the radar. 


But now, as the guidelines officially go into effect this week, some contractors and pro-business organizations are crying foul, prompting city councilors to reconsider the provision. They argue that, rather than protecting workers’ rights, the new provision—known as a community workforce agreement, or CWA—is merely a sop to unions.


“I’m hearing that this is going to cost the city money,” Councilor Ron Trujillo tells SFR. “If this is going to cost us more than it’s going to help, then where are we going as a city?” 


Modeled after similar rules that operate in cities like Los Angeles and Oakland, the CWA remained relatively uncontroversial until late last month, when the city started preparing for a $1.4 million project to build office space in the Railyard’s Market Station building. 


The CWA applies only to city-funded construction jobs of more than $500,000. The city has seven construction projects slated for the CWA, totaling nearly $15 million—less than half the total bond monies approved by voters and the city council in the past year. They include broadband expansion and the Southwest Activity Node Park. 


The CWA works like this: of the first 40 employees hired, 20 must be hired through a union. The other 20 can be hired in any way, but they’re required to sign up with a union for the duration of the project. Each additional employee also must be hired through a union. 


Construction wages wouldn’t necessarily change, as contractors would still be required to pay the “prevailing wages” set by the state Department of Workforce Solutions. Unions would simply make sure those wages are paid out properly. But the rules could discourage some contractors from bidding on large-scale city projects, potentially making the projects slightly more expensive for taxpayers by reducing the number of options the city has to choose from.


“There’s a big limitation on number of union contractors that bid,” Eric Enfield, president of Architectural Alliance Inc., tells SFR. “I think that’s going to lead to a higher price.”


At the same time, Enfield says that big public projects attract bidders no matter what. Enfield looked into the Market Station project but decided not to bid because at least a dozen other architects were interested. He adds that even though public projects generally pay more, he usually stays away from them because they’re heavily regulated.


Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Simon Brackley, who opposes the measure, says that the struggles of the local construction industry are reason enough for the city to reconsider the CWA. He adds that Albuquerque has more unionized construction workers than Santa Fe, which could mean a loss of local money to another community.


“If you look around town, you’ll see projects that have stalled,” Brackley tells SFR. “We want to stop that trend.” 


(Still, the CWA must abide by the city’s local preference rules, which give local contractors a 10 percent advantage during the bidding process.)


The CWA would also require every employee working on a large city project to pay union dues, which vary based on wage and profession. To New Mexico Business Coalition President Carla Sonntag, the mandate marginalizes workers while enriching unions. She estimates that more than 95 percent of construction companies in the state are nonunion. 


“They’re not union because they don’t want to be in a union,” Sonntag tells SFR. “It’s very prejudicial, in our mind.” 


But nailing down an accurate percentage of the state’s unionized construction workers isn’t easy. New Mexico Building and Trades Council President Ray Baca says that Sonntag’s estimate includes contractors on small projects that may take only a few people to complete. He adds that his organization, a statewide alliance of craft unions, represents between 7,500 and 8,500 workers in the commercial and industrial construction industry. 


According to the Associated General Contractors of America, approximately 45,000 construction workers are employed in New Mexico (approximately 11.5 percent are unemployed). 


Mayor David Coss, who played a big role in getting the council to approve the CWA back in February, says that much of the resistance to the CWA is part of an effort to undermine organized labor. Coss, a former local union president himself, says he “believes in partnership” and that the city’s cooperation with the unions is on par with that of other organizations like the Chamber of Commerce and Creative Santa Fe. 


“There’s a giant anti-union bloc in the country, and they get real upset when somebody tries to work with unions,” Coss tells SFR. 


At least one Santa Fe contractor thinks the new rules are worth a shot. Peter Brill, president of Sarcon Construction Corporation, says he hires his employees solely through construction unions because their members learn proper skills and safety through sponsored apprenticeships. The CWA, he says, would encourage more of this in Santa Fe.  


“A trained and skilled workforce is critical,” Brill tells SFR. “If the CWA achieves that goal, we’re all for it.”


 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 

 

 
10.03.2012 at 12:14 | Reply |

CWA's do not guarentee the workers will be efficient or safe or capable, they guarentee only union workers will get jobs paid for by taxpayer money.  In cities like Los Angeles, this substantially inflates the cost of labor, provides more dues money to unions to use for political activism and shuts out non-union contractors who are just as competent and cost taxpayers less to do equivalent work.   

The taxpayer does not benefit automatically from CWA's, also known as "prevailing wage agreements". 

The decline of unions in the private sector is very much due to the fact many union roles have been taken over by federal/state employment law.  Unions don't do very much anymore but lobby for increased wages and benefits, which is why the majority of unionized industries failed and disappeared.  

CWA's are an attempt to keep unions alive by granting them a monopoly.  As with any monopoly, freedom to contract, innovate and adapt and labor mobility are harmed.  Also, CWA's offer another opportunity for government officials to pick winners and losers than competition, which tries to deliver the best product for the best price. 

Lobbyists exist because government officials can grant favors.  The fewer favors government can or will grant, the less fruitful it is to hire a lobbyist or work on officials to go this way or that.     

 

10.03.2012 at 03:43 | Reply |

Another way to look at the impact of a CWA is that for a given amount of money, a higher wage rate means fewer labor hours can be paid for, which translates to fewer people with jobs.  Is it better to have fewer people making more money or more people making less, but less dependent on welfare?

Sure Mayor Coss wants unions to survive.  He made a career out of it, living off the dues collected.  Now he's mayor, living off taxpayers. 

If I read the numbers right, unions "represent" 5% of the state's available construction workforce.  Said another way, 95% of the available construction workforce has been banned from doing any work for the City of Santa Fe.  How does that get competitive value for the money on construction projects for the taxpayers? 

Sounds like Coss is doing some old friends a favor.  And that construction unions have priced their members out of the general market, or don't provide a value workers seem to want, or both.  A private sector company goes out of business when it has a product that is too expensive for value received, or offers products nobody will buy.  Hence, the decline in union membership in the private sector in the US, and the construction industy in NM particularly.  

This CWA enables the related unions to continue on with a failed enterprise, because some politicians like the idea and will protect them, using other people's money they get under duress, via taxation.  

Coss sounds a little silly, too.  In the NM construction market, union shops are insignificant.  They have been undermined almost to extinction already.  The music is over, and he is dancing to the echoes in his head, not economic realities, and surely not his fiduciary duty to taxpayers.     

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close