Pay it Forward

Helen Mirren and friends participate in a creaky spy thriller remake

We greet The Debt with a sense of relief, if only because its title could portend some hasty hectoring documentary about Congress figuring out its financial "super committee," and this movie is something else.


It is actually Shakespeare in Love director John Madden's version of the 2007 Israeli spy thriller Ha-Hov. The Debt isn't the worst offender as far as colonizing remakes go, nor is it much to write home about. Madden's movie is pedigreed, pulse-quickening and perfectly respectable. It has a good chance for some award consideration.


With Jessica Chastain, Marton Csokas and Sam Worthington as their younger selves, Helen Mirren, Tom Wilkinson and Ciarán Hinds play three retired Mossad agents in the 1990s, haunted by a mission that went wrong in 1960s East Berlin. For reasons of narrative security, details need not be dwelled on here, except to say that this is also a love story—and a hate story. Madden and company do at least manage to fulfill the minimum required ick factor for any film involving the entrapment of a Nazi gynecologist. As the tokenish villain Dieter Vogel, Jesper Christensen provides a literal portrayal of the banality of evil.


Overall, The Debt reads as a sort of practice run at high seriousness from writers Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman, of Kick-Ass and X-Men: First Class, and Peter Straughan, of The Men Who Stare at Goats. In a way, it's OK if they need more practice; here, the script matters mostly for its stewardship of conceptual clarity. We could not ask for—nor want—a more direct description of moral ambiguity.


If there's any challenge to be had from The Debt, it's by the actors. They're why we really watch: to discover what Chastain can do when not under the direction of Terrence Malick (plenty, and The Help didn't quite count); whether Worthington is worthy (let's say sure); who Csokas is exactly (the giver of this film's nerviest performance, as it turns out); and how the elder trio maintains its poise in fake accents and a corseted, flashback-intensive structure.


When less engrossed, we may notice that this cast isn't very Jewish. The movie doesn't mind because its themes are so strenuously universal and pertain to problematic identity anyway. Fair enough, but that willful lack of texture carries over to setting, too. Neither the Cold War world nor the dubious 1990s nostalgia for it comes to life effectively.


There is a twist (although in this movie's listless schematic diagram of moral compromise, it feels more like a slight bend) and a protracted geriatric grappling match that would be self-parodic even if something like it hadn't already been done, for laughs, on Family Guy. But that goes to the theme again: how very unsettling, the settling of scores.

Letters to the Editor

Mail letters to PO Box 4910 Santa Fe, NM 87502 or email them to editor[at]sfreporter.com. Letters (no more than 200 words) should refer to specific articles in the Reporter. Letters will be edited for space and clarity.

We also welcome you to follow SFR on social media (on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and comment there. You can also email specific staff members from our contact page.