Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Facebook Connect
 
This Week's SFR Picks
 
— That’s a Lota Treasure!
In SFR’s new humor column, Forrest Fenn pulls a fast one
— Downs Doings
Sources: FBI has conducted interviews about controversial racino deal
— Cinderella Story
Santa Fe Fuego: America's worst, most lovable baseball team
— Summer Guide 2013
93 Days of Summer; 93 Ways to Enjoy Them
Guides Santa Fe Manual Restaurant Guide Best of Santa Fe Bar & Nightlife Summer Arts

Letter America: Dear Doctor Guy Walksintoabar

Letter America Dear Doctor Guy, My friend recently stopped taking my calls because I’m dating her ex-boyfriend, but they broke up like over two years ago. I don’t know what to do.—Helpless Hottie ... More

Jun 17, 2013 By Robert Wilder Comments 0
 
 
 

 

 
Home / Articles / Interviews / Interviews /  SFR Talk: Rail Rundown
Interviews 06.29.2011 3 Comments

SFR Talk: Rail Rundown

with Santa Fe Officials

By Ramon A Lovato
Rail Runner

The New Mexico Rail Runner Express can’t seem to catch a break. On July 17, the Rio Metro Regional Transit District Board opted, in a 6-5 vote, to eliminate weekend train service between Belen and Santa Fe [SFReporter.com, June 18: “No More Weekend Rail Runner Service”]. The change is intended to curb budget cuts that resulted in a $1.2 million decline in Rail Runner funding from fiscal year 2011 to FY2012. The train already endures criticism for its limited schedule, but the decision raises other concerns: Santa Fe didn’t get a vote. In fact, no Santa Fe representative has sat on the Rio Metro Board since its inception. Now, Santa Fe officials are pushing the Rio Metro Board to reverse the decision.

Conventions & Visitors Bureau Executive Director Jim Bradbury
It’s a shame that the weekend service is being cut off because it’s going to hurt the retail merchants tremendously. That’s a lot of spending that’s not going to happen in our community, so that’s hurtful.

The Rio Metro area has never included the city of Santa Fe since it was set up. I don’t know that that makes sense because Santa Fe has always been part of the service.

District 2 City Councilor Rebecca Wurzburger
This is a major setback for Santa Fe. We’ve been looking at ways of having the train enhance the local economy. We’ve been working to move the visitors’ center to the Railyard. We’ve arranged the [Santa Fe] Pick-Up.

It is good to have representation. Had Santa Fe been sitting at the table, perhaps that decision might not have been made; perhaps it would. It would certainly have been much better for us to have had a voice. We don’t right now.

The issue right now is, how are we going to get the reversal of something that was moving forward positively without our input?

We’re telling them, ‘Reverse your decision now; give us some more time to come up with funding alternatives.’

This problem cannot be solved by cuts. It’s the same problem we had when we went through our budget recently. We have to, as a community, spend more time thinking about how you start building additional markets.

Mayor David Coss
I think the decision has to be changed. We actually just met with members of the Rio Metro Board, and Rio Metro and [Department of Transportation] individuals. It was myself, Councilor [Rosemary] Romero, the director of our transitional district, Commissioner [Virginia] Vigil, Councilor [Ronald] Trujillo. We think it was the wrong decision and we’ve asked them to change that.

What’s clear from this meeting is that the Rail Runner has some issues that need to be addressed. There’s a deficit at the Rail Runner of about $5 million a year.

We’re not going to cut our way to a stronger economy and healthier communities.

As local governments, we’re willing to do our share. Communities did pass the ⁄8 [percent gross receipts] tax. We’re going to ask the state to make this a great rail system and the federal government to help as well.

All transportation is subsidized—any state highways, bike lanes, rail systems, transit systems. They do bear a platform that your economy is built on.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
 
 
 

 

 
07.01.2011 at 02:14 | Reply |

THE RAILRUNNER IS TOTALLY OVER BUILT FOR THE TYPE OF SERVICE IT OFFERS. A LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM A WAY MORE ECONOMICAL TO OPERATE, ONE SIMILAR TO THE ONE IN DENVER. 2ND, it is cumbersome, ,2 and 1/2 hours, Santa Fe to Alb. !! Nothing like shooting 5 hours out of your day. Lastly, it just does not work, there is no evidence that the rail runner has done anything for business in SF at least not enough to offset the new gross reciepts tax wnich in itself is a business killer. If the rail runner is going to survive, then raise ticket prices to a level that pays for the service, let the market decide if it is worthwhile.

 

07.01.2011 at 11:35 | Reply |

" the Rail Runner has some issues" like the fact that is was a massive waste of tax pay monies to begin with.

Major Coss's statement "We’re going to ask the state to make this a great rail system and the federal government to help as well." ignores the fact that the Federal monies are no more and the state is broke. Just where is the money going to come from? Think about what could have been done with the over 400 million it cost to build that giant boondoggle!!!I say shut the whole thing down and be done with it. Lets stop pouring monies we don't have down this rat hole!

 

07.06.2011 at 09:36 | Reply |

While I agree that the cost of a Railrunner ticket is too low, I cannot agree that this whole enterprise has been a waste of time and money. Also, it does not take 2 hours to get from Santa Fe to Albuquerque. It takes 1 hour and 20 minutes, not much more than taking a car and dealing with parking etc.

I ride the Railrunner and have noted that it is consistently being used by numerous people. The cars are consistently close to full and riders are getting on and off at every stop. This tells me it has been a valuable addition to the transportation landscape here in New Mexico. Raise ticket prices across the board to a more reasonable level and instead of completely cutting weekend service alter it: perhaps one morning train and one evening train each way on Saturdays with no Sunday service. This kind of compromise would keep ridership up and allow for the service to grow over time.

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close