Oct. 23, 2014

This Week's SFR Picks

Newsletters

Choose your newsletter(s):
* indicates required
September 23, 2014 by Joey Peters  
October 7, 2014 by Joey Peters  
September 24, 2014 by Enrique Limón  
September 23, 2014 by Robert Basler  
September 24, 2014 by Peter St. Cyr  

SFR Events

Special Issues

 

 
Home / Articles / Cinema / Movie Reviews /  What’s Cooking?
Julie & Julia
Qu’est-ce que c’est?

What’s Cooking?

We’re not sure, but it’s nothing of substance

August 12, 2009, 12:00 am
By

By Armond White

Talking Heads’ “Psycho Killer” underscores the Julie & Julia scene where Julie (Amy Adams) is called “lobster killer” by her husband as she prepares a dish from Julia Child’s cookbook. It’s an inane music-movie idea, but the Heads’ classic gives this pedestrian film a couple of minutes of genuine art—and fun. Surely director Nora Ephron nixed using The B-52s’ “Rock Lobster” because that trash-pop epiphany violates her bourgie taste—and snobbery explains why Julie & Julia was made at all.

Alas, Julie & Julia really is about nothing deeper than the different life paths of Julia Child, the pioneering American-born chef who brought French cuisine to the consciousness of the American public, and the Amherst-educated yuppie who used Child’s book, Mastering the Art of French Cooking, as the raison d’être of her Salon-based blog. That blog gave Julie Powell (Adams) access to fame, and that’s all Ephron understands. (Will Paris Hilton be Ephron’s next subject?)

This movie doesn’t match the delights of such sensual, aesthetic food movies as Le Grande Bouffe, Babette’s Feast, Tampopo or even Woman on Top. It merely dramatizes Powell and Child in contrasting routes to media success via book and blog publishing, TV and film celebrity.

Ephron blends Child’s post-WWII years in France with Powell’s post-9.11 careerism, but Ephron doesn’t go deeper into intellectual experience. Rather, she prizes the women’s rich dining privileges with only a glancing interest in their spiritual similarities. Pointless scenes of Child’s husband (Stanley Tucci) suffering McCarthy-era pressure are as insultingly superficial as the 9.11 trauma Julie endures on her way to making a chocolate soufflé. We’re actually expected to tolerate a scene where Julie complains about moving into a 900-square-foot apartment in Queens.

Streep’s grandstanding Julia impersonation counters Adams’ ingenue sensitivity. “What an incredible actress!” a man exclaimed at a recent screening as the movie ended. Fact is, Streep can be a non-credible actress. Her tall, well-dressed Julia is basically comic mimicry, emphasizing middle-aged elegance and emulating the famous piping voice and hulking stance. Streep is best when she plumbs human feeling. This crafty performance stays as superficial as Dan Aykroyd’s Julia Child spoof on Saturday Night Live.

Ephron has Julie reason that Julia found joy in cooking. Too bad Ephron flubs showing the richness of skill or the sumptuousness of sensual pleasure. The final scene of Child in her kitchen turns her domestic archetype into a stultifying Jeanne Dielman icon that could as easily represent female imprisonment.

Ephron conveys neither gustatory joy nor cinematic know-how.

Julie & Julia
Directed by Nora Ephron
With Meryl Streep, Amy Adams, Stanley Tucci and Chris Messina


Regal Stadium 14
123 min.
PG-13

 

comments powered by Disqus
 
Close
Close
Close