Humankind's most recently scheduled date with the apocalypse came and went without much fanfare. But in New Mexico this year, with fire scorching the ground, smoke filling the air and drought settling in, it doesn't exactly feel like we've gotten off scot-free.
Parts of the state are suffering through the driest periods since records have been kept, ie, well over 100 years. The federal government has allowed ranchers emergency grazing access to restricted grasslands in several New Mexico counties, but the cattle and hay industries are still set to take a brutal loss. And kids certainly won't be fishing in the Santa Fe River this year. Everyone is trying to forget dire predictions of a megadrought, but no one trusts the clouds to bring reprieve anytime soon.
Peak oil is entrenched as a sound bite in the mainstream media and energy resources are a discussion issue at every level of government, but no one really talks about peak water. Access to plentiful, cheap, clean water is taken as a given—even in the dry southwestern United States—but it may just be our most precarious resource.
What are the major threats to our water supply in Santa Fe and how can we better manage and allocate it?
A study published this past February in the weekly science journal Nature starts off with what sounds like good news. Scientists examined a 270-foot core sample pulled from New Mexico's Valles Caldera and used some fancy techniques (er, molecular palaeotemperature proxies, anyone?) to examine sedimentary layers, determine dry and wet periods, and think deeply about interglacial climatic variability.
The conclusion is that "in the absence of anthropogenic forcing, the region should be entering a cooler and wetter phase." Hurray! Except we have lots of "anthropogenic forcing," otherwise known as human-induced climate change, possibly enough to tip us in the other direction altogether. Principal researcher and University of New Mexico associate professor Peter Fawcett told the New York Times, "…we are certainly increasing the possibility of crossing a critical threshold to severe and lasting drought conditions."
Maybe that's why the study is titled "Extended megadroughts in the southwestern United States during Pleistocene interglacials."
Fire in the Watershed
The Santa Fe Watershed—the drainage area out of the Pecos Wilderness that fills our reservoirs to the tune of 40 percent of Santa Fe's drinking water—has been closed to the public since 1932 in order to minimize fire danger.
After the Cerro Grande fire in 2000, the City of Santa Fe commissioned a report from Hydrosphere Resource Consultants to determine the watershed's vulnerability. The results were bleak. The watershed is thick with the kind of wild vegetation on which fires thrive. An uncontrolled fire in the watershed would fill the reservoirs with a thick coating of ash; subsequent erosion would deposit even more ash and sediment in the reservoirs, reducing their capacities and rendering the water unusable for years.
According to city Water Resources and Conservation Manager Rick Carpenter, "Some estimates say it would take up to 10 years for the reservoirs to recover enough to produce drinking water." Carpenter says that, prior to the Buckman Direct Diversion project, that kind of hit in capacity would have meant severe water restrictions. But the BDD is capable of handling the city's daily needs—unless we're in a megadrought.
The other good news is that controlled burns and aggressive management over the past decade have reduced the likelihood of an uncontrollable fire in the watershed.
While it's comforting to know that the Buckman Direct Diversion can provide for the city's water needs, some city residents and activists remain concerned that the water, diverted from the Rio Grande, will be subject to radionuclides from Los Alamos National Laboratory and other upstream contaminants.
Radiological contaminants have been demonstrated to enter the Rio Grande through Los Alamos Canyon during periods of storm-water runoff. During high runoff, concentrations of contaminants have sometimes exceeded the levels deemed to be "safe" by regulatory agencies. However, in addition to a water treatment facility designed to remove any such contaminants, the BDD has a shut-off mechanism to prevent taking in water during high runoff periods.
Additional filters and steps in the treatment plant are designed to remove chemicals and pollutants associated with industrial waste, pesticides and pharmaceutical products. But Joni Arends, executive director of Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, remains concerned about the treatment process.
Challenging scenarios like drought, fire and radiation, she says, compound each other. "We've built a nuclear weapons facility in a wildfire zone and an active seismic area above our drinking water supply. That's really the worst case scenario—what we already have," Arends says.
Concern over the potential for seismic activity to cause a catastrophic radiation leak at LANL has heightened in the wake of recent events in Japan. If an earthquake cracks LANL in half, all bets are off.
In an April 20 article in High Country News, writer Matt Weiser pointed out that Federal Bureau of Reclamation data indicates that reservoir capacity in 11 Western states has dropped by 8 percent, or "enough water to serve at least 9 million households."
All dams naturally collect sediment. According to Weiser's article, many dams both ancient and modern incorporate systems for flushing sediment, but the concept never took hold in the United States during the heyday of dam construction. Reservoirs without the ability to remove sediment are essentially unsustainable infrastructure with limited life spans.
Anyone with a barrel under a canale knows the art of capturing water in an arid landscape is, like a few other things, all about size. The bigger the barrel, the wetter the result.
New Mexico's Elephant Butte Reservoir was built in 1915 with the capacity to store 2.6 million acre-feet of water. Thus far, 600,000 acre-feet of storage have been lost to sedimentary buildup.
The New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources, in partnership with New Mexico Tech, has performed extensive aquifer mapping in the state. Around Santa Fe, it's clear that a steady decline in subsurface water levels has continued more or less unabated since initial levels were noted. A typical well in Santa Fe demonstrates an average drop of 1.5 feet per year over the past 57 years.
Statewide, the largest consumption of water resources is the agricultural industry—a key piece of the regional economy and a potential linchpin for food security going into the future. Environmentalists and some policy makers would like to see better management of the water used for agriculture, and a stronger push toward reusing and recycling.
But such practices demand investment in treatment plants to ensure the reused water is safe for crops intended for human consumption. In addition, reused water has an altered mineral content and typically contains much higher levels of salinity. The shift in mineral content means that huge amounts of time and money would need to be poured into soil management and remediation in order to keep crop yields high and healthy.
A lot of parents probably wish they could find a video game that would trick their kids into doing something useful.
Intel Research scientist Tad Hirsch and Sandia National Laboratories scientist Vince Tidwell have done just that. Using immersive online gaming systems like Second Life and World of Warcraft as starting points, the two developed a game called Water Wars. Players tackle the challenge- and intrigue-filled scenario of, you guessed it, New Mexico water issues.
Instead of choosing an avatar who wanders the world killing trolls or just loitering in virtual reality, players opt to role-play farmers, developers or water management officials. True, it doesn’t sound as immediately alluring as wasting fools with a digital shotgun, but the game is already being tested locally and is, allegedly, more compelling than you’d think. As part of the Currents 2011: Santa Fe International New Media Festival (currents2011.com), Hirsch presents and discusses the project at the Santa Fe Complex.
Tad Hirsch Water Wars Presentation
10:30 am-noon Saturday, June 11
Free, register to attend at waterwars.eventbrite.com
Santa Fe Complex
632 Agua Fria St.
Tim DeChristopher, aka Bidder 70, became something of a folk hero when he outbid oil and gas industry representatives for the exploration rights to 13 parcels of Utah land at a Bureau of Land Management auction in the waning days of the George W Bush administration. DeChristopher had no way to pay the $1.8 million he committed at auction, but his activism effectively tied up the parcels until the use of the land could be reconsidered under President Barack Obama.
On March 3 of this year, DeChristopher was found guilty of false representation and violating an onshore oil and gas leasing act. His prison sentence will be determined at a June 23 sentencing hearing. DeChristopher's actions relate specifically to water because when natural gas is discovered and extracted, the industry practices typically utilized can be radically destructive to the water quality of underground aquifers.
Prior to his sentencing, New Energy Economy hosts a lecture and discussion with DeChristopher in Santa Fe.
Tim DeChristopher Lecture
6-8 pm Monday, June 13
$10 suggested donation
Greer Garson Theatre
Santa Fe University of Art and Design
1600 St. Michael’s Drive
Celebrando las Acequias
The Arid Lands Institute hosts the fourth annual Celebrando las Acequias event this week. The theme is Water Resilience and stems from both historic and contemporary perspectives on the use of acequias for irrigation and the community practice of managing precious resources.
In addition to a photography exhibition and live music, the three-day event includes a series of lectures and presentations aimed at water security, watershed management, farming, conservation and a host of other issues and ideas.
New Mexico’s historic acequia system established the use and conservation of water as a core community value, rather than a top-down bureaucratic management issue. Arid Lands Institute Event Director Estevan Arellano sees the potential for combining historical practices with modern conservation techniques to illuminate new regional strategies for water management.
Celebrando las Acequias
6 pm Friday; 9 am-9 pm Saturday; 9 am-3 pm Sunday, June 10-12
Santa Fe River Events
In the past year, the Santa Fe River has become the locus of community-oriented art events aimed at raising awareness about a healthy river and the importance of smart water policy.
In November of 2010, the Santa Fe Art Institute, in conjunction with 350.org, conducted Flash Flood, an event that involved hundreds of Santa Fe residents gathering in the dry riverbed and flipping up blue boards and tarps in a synchronous motion captured by satellite imaging. The action created a sudden "flood" in the river and corresponded to other actions carried out around the world at nearly 20 other locations.
On June 4, artists and community members, including Matthew Chase-Daniel, Don Kennell, Chrissie Orr, Rulan Tangen, Dominique Mazeaud, Bobbe Besold and Aimee Conlee performed water rituals and created temporary art installations for How's The Water. The event was geared at raising awareness about the ever-dwindling and precious commodity.
Water as a Global Commodity
For most Americans, the ability to stand around with a hose and let it rip is taken as a given, just like the right to bear arms and the right to have a big, comfortable chair in front of a giant television. But in many parts of the world, access to water has never been taken for granted and our casual use of such a precious resource is perceived as yet another symbol of Western gluttony.
Only about 1 percent of the world's water is fresh and readily available. It's more precious than oil and the cost may soon skyrocket. US companies are already vying to ship water from Alaska to arid parts of India and the Middle East. But companies in China and other nations are getting in on the action as well, with Australia being the first target for many "water brokers."
If a megadrought or other disaster shriveled the water supply in the American Southwest and governments and residents were forced to import water at a "fair market price," we'd be totally unprepared to pay for it.
Top Commercial Water Users in Santa Fe
This information is from the current available public records and represents the total usage of each entity between January and April of 2011.
Water User Millions of Gallons in a Four-Month Period
SANTA FE COUNTY UTILITIES DIVISION 40,383,200
LAS CAMPANAS 32,509,100
COUNTRY CLUB GARDENS 5,620,600
CASITAS DE SANTA FE 4,880,900
TALAVERA APARTMENTS 4,383,700
PARK PLAZAS MULTIFAMILY 4,214,500
LA FONDA 3,884,600
ST VINCENT HOSPITAL 3,623,400
LAS PALOMAS APARTMENTS 2,961,000
RANCHO VIZCAYA APARTMENTS 2,891,500
QUAIL RUN ASSOCIATION INC 2,859,000
CITY OF SANTA FE (Genoveva Chavez Community Center) 2,722,800
CORONADO CONDOMINIUMS 2,597,300
VISTA LINDA APARTMENTS 2,341,800
Know Your Water Rates
City of Santa Fe water rates for 2011 more than triple for residences and businesses that exceed their monthly allotments, which vary depending on the number of family members in a residence, the number of residences in an apartment complex or other multifamily development, and the size of a business.
Regardless of allotment, charges are always made per 1,000 gallons used and the price increase is the same for all categories of water customers.
The average Santa Fe resident pays $5.18 per 1,000 gallons, up to 7,000 gallons in a month. After that, the rate becomes $18.55 per 1,000 gallons.
According to city ordinance, the rate will continue to increase by 8.2 percent each year for the next four years.